Business Law UNIT 1
Nemo Dat Quod Non Habet -Section 27 of sales of goods act
When the seller himself is the owner of the goods, he conveys a good title in the goods when he sells it to the buyer. Problem occurs when he is neither the owner nor has any authority to do this.
The maxim NEMO DAT QUOD NON HABET means “no better title to the goods than the seller had”. It means that where the goods are sold by a person who is not the owner or has no authority to sell them, the buyer acquires no better title than what the seller had. If the title of the seller is defective then the title of the buyer is also defective and he cannot acquire a superior title to the seller.
EXCEPTIONS
The seller of the goods may not be having a good title yet the buyer gets a good title. The exceptions to the same are as follows:-
Performance of a Contract
It is the duty of the seller to sell the goods and of the buyer to accept the goods and pay for them according to the terms and conditions of the contract. It means that the seller has to deliver the goods of the kind, at a time and place in the manner agreed upon and the buyer has t o accept the goods when they are delivered properly.
Sellers Duty To sell The Goods
The duty of the seller is to sell the goods in accordance with the terms and conditions of the contract of sale of goods .According to section 2(2) of the act there should be a voluntary transfer of possession of the goods from one person to another.
The delivery of the goods can either be symbolic, actual or constructive delivery.
Rules regarding Delivery
DUTY OF THE BUYER
UNIT II
UNPAID SELLER:-
In simple words, "Unpaid seller" means a person who has sold the goods for a price but price has not been paid to him.
According to Sec 45, the seller of the goods is deemed to be an unpaid seller:
(i) When the whole of the price has not paid or tendered
(ii) When a bill of exchange or other negotiable instrument has been received as a condition payment and the condition on which it has been received remains unfulfilled by reason of dishonor of the instrument or otherwise.
RIGHTS OF AN UNPAID SELLER
An unpaid seller has two-fold rights, namely:
1.1 Rights of lien
1.2 Right of stoppage of goods in transit
1.3 Right of rescale
2.1 Suit for price.
2.2 Suit for damages for non-acceptance.
2.3 Suit for special damages and interest
1.1 Rights of lien
The right of lien means lawfully right to retain the goods possession until the full price is received. An unpaid seller can exercise his right of lien in following cases. Sec 47-49
Other rules to satisfy the conditions for this right are
Termination of right of lien
Seller’s right of lien is terminated in following cases.
Example: A seller “S” sells a TV set to “B” and delivers it to “B” and since the TV set was not functioning properly, “B” delivered it back to “S” for the repairs. It was held that “S” can not exercise his right of lien over TV set.
1.2 Right of stoppage of goods in transit:-
It means stoppage of goods while they are in transit to take possession until the price is paid (Sec. 50-52) Unpaid seller can stop the goods in transit in the following cases:
Example:- "X" sells 100 bales of cotton to "Y" but delivery will be two stages. "X" delivers 50 bales first. Later on he comes know that "Y" has become insolvent. "X" can stop delivery of bales in transit.
1.3 Right of Resale:-
If a buyer fails to pay or offer the price within a reasonable time, the unpaid seller has the right to resell the goods in the following circumstances.
a) Where the goods are of perishable nature.
b) Where the unpaid seller has exercised his right of lien or stoppage in transit and gives a notice to buyer of his intension of resell the goods.
c) Where the unpaid seller has expressly reserved his right of resale.
d) Where seller gives notice to the buyer of his intension to resell and the buyer does not pay within a reasonable time, he can
However if the seller sells with out the notice to the buyer, he can not
Example:“M” sells 100 blankets to “N” and gives him one week for payment. “N” does not pay. “M” can resell those to any other person
2.1 Suit for Price (Sec 55):- If the goods have passed to the buyer and buyer refuse to pay the price, the seller can sue for price.
2.2 Suit for Damages for Non Acceptance (Sec 56): - If buyer refuses to accept and pay for the goods, the seller has the right to sue him for damages non-acceptance. He can recover only damages and not full price.
2.3
Suit For Special Damages & Interest (Sec
61):- The unpaid seller can recover the reasonable
interest on the unpaid price goods sold. The seller can also sue
the buyer for special damages where both the parties are aware of
such loss at the time of contract.
UNIT III:-NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS
Negotiable instrument is a piece of paper which enables its holder to claim something usually money but sometimes goods. A negotiable instrument includes a promissory note, A bill of exchange etc.
A bill of exchange has 2 qualities:-
PROMISSORY NOTE- SECTION 4
A promissory note is an instrument in writing containing an unconditional undertaking signed by the maker to pay a certain sum to the holder of the instrument.
It contains the following essentials:-
BILL OF EXCHANGE –SECTION 5
WHO CAN ACCEPT
HOLDER, HOLDER IN DUE COURSE AND PAYMENT IN DUE COURSE
HOLDER (SECTION-8)
Holder means the owner of the negotiable instrument. In order to be a holder he must satisfy the following conditions:-
When a negotiable instrument is originally made the payee is the holder of the same. If the payee transfers his right to another person then the transferee becomes the holder in place of the payee
HOLDER IN DUE COURSE (SECTION-9)
A holder in due course is always a privileged person and generally has a good title even though the title of the transferor is defective. When a person receives a negotiable instrument as a holder in due course he is capable of receiving a better title than the transferor. Ex:- If a person receives a negotiable instrument by theft the title of the person having the same will be defective. But if he transfers it to a holder in due course the title of the holder in due course will be good.
A person can be called a holder in due course
If the following conditions are satisfied:-
PAYMENT IN DUE COURSE(SECTION 10)
DISTINCTION BETWEEN A BILL OF EXCHANGE AND A PROMISSORY NOTE.
Promissory note
|
Bill of exchange
|
CHEQUE- SECTION 6
A cheque is a bill of exchange drawn on a specified banker, it includes an electronic image of truncated cheque.
FEATURES OF A CHEQUE
DISTINCTION BETWEEN A CHEQUE AND A BILL OF EXCHANGE.
NEGOTIATION OF NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS
When the holder of the negotiable instrument i.e the person who is entitled to receive the payment transfers the negotiable instrument to another person so that the transferee is now entitled to the payment, the instrument is said to have been negotiated.
Negotiation further means that the transfer of the negotiable instrument form one person to another in accordance with the provisions of the negotiable instrument act. The transfer should have been made with the intention to transfer the rights. For ex:- if I deliver a cheque to my servant for a safe custody he will not be entitled to receive the payment as he cannot be called the holder of the cheque. But if the cheque is delivered to the servant for his services the servant will become the holder of the cheque.
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN NEGOTIATION AND ASSIGNMENT
KINDS OF INDORSEMENT
HOLDER, HOLDER IN DUE COURSE AND PAYMENT IN DUE COURSE
Holder means the owner of the negotiable instrument. In order to be a holder the following conditions should be satisfied:-
When a negotiable instrument is originally made, the payee is the holder of the same. If the payee transfers his right to another person then the transferee becomes the holder in place of the payee. In case of bearer instrument the person to whom it is transferred , the transferee is called the “bearer” . The persons who are entitled to become the holder are as follows:-
HOLDER IN DUE COURSE (SECTION-9)
A holder in due course is a person who generally has a good title even though the title of the transferor may be a defective one. EX:- if a person obtains a negotiable instrument by means of theft, fraud etc the title of the person having the possession of the same may be a defective one but if he transfers it to someone (who is a holder in due course)he may have a good title for the same.
In order to be a holder in due course the following conditions should be satisfied:-
PAYMENT IN DUE COURSE
Generally a person making a payment in due course is discharged by making such payment i.e even if the payment is made to a wrong person but it is otherwise in due course the person making the payment cannot be held liable for the same.
In order that the payment is in due course the following conditions should be satisfied:-
DISHCHARE FROM LIABILITIES ON NOTES, BILLS AND CHEQUES.
When a party who is liable on a negotiable instrument ceases to be liable he is said to have been discharged from the liability.
MODES OF DISCHARGE:
CROSSING OF CHEQUES
Open And Uncrossed Cheques
An uncrossed cheque is called an open chque and its payment is made at the counter at the time of presentation of the cheque.
In this case if a wrong person takes away the payment of such cheque it is difficult to trace him. Moreover if the cheque is transferred to a wrong person and then from him to a person who is the holder in due course, the holder in due course will get a good title. This difficulty can be removed by the crossing of the cheques.
The payment of the crossed cheques is not to be made at the counter but the person who wants to get the payment has to get the same through the bank. Crossing of cheques is an instruction to the drawee i.e the paying bank that the payment is not to bne made at the counter but through the bank. If the person takes the payment through the bank it is possible to trace the person who has taken the payment from the crossed cheque.
CROSSING AND MODES OF CROSSING
GENERAL CROSSING:-
Where a cheque bears across its face an addition of words “and co” or any other abb between two tranverse lines, that addition shall be deemed to be a crossing, It means that the drawee bank is not to make the payment of the cheque at the counter but the payment is to be made only to another bank who collects the chque on behalf of the holder.
SPECIAL CROSSING:-
Where a chque bears across its face an addition, the name of the banker either with or without the words “ not negotiable” that cheque is deemed to be a crossing and the cheque is deemed to cross specially and to be crossed to that banker.
ONLY ONE SPECIAL CROSSING:-
Special crossing can only be made in the name of one banker. Where a cheque is crossed specially to more than one banker the banker on whom it is drawn shall refuse payment thereof. One exception to the same is that if a cheque is specially crossed and it may make than the latter may collect as an agent for the former bank.
“NOT NEGOTIABLE CROSSING”
After the words not negotiable are added a holder in due course will not be able to have a better title than that of the transferor. Ordinarily in a negotiable instrument if the title of the transferor is bad, the transferee if he is the holder in due course. Will have a good title and will also be able to convey a good title.
PRESENTMENT OF NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT
There are three kinds of presentment:-
PRESENTMENT FOR ACCEPTANCE (SECTION- 61)
Only a bill of exchange is to be presented for acceptance. Every bill of exchange is not required to be presented for acceptance. A bill of exchange payable on demand or on a certain day or a certain period after date need not be accepted and it becomes due for payment even otherwise. When a bill of exchange is expressed to be payable “after sight” it means that its payment is to be made only after acceptance. Thus if A draws a bill of exchange on B on 1st January ordering him to pay “two months after sight” its payment will become due only after the lapse of the period of two months from the date it is accepted by B. If B does not accept the bill its payment will never become due.
PRESENTMENT TO WHOME:-
PRESENTMENT BY WHOM:-
The presentment is to be made by the holder of the bill of exchange. A bill of exchange may even be negotiated before the acceptance has been obtained.
TIME AND PLACE OF PRESENTMENT
If any time or place for presentment is specified in a bill of exchange it must be presented for acceptance accordingly. Where no time and place has been mentioned in the bill it must be presented within a reasonable time after it has been drawn and in business hours in a business day. If the drawee had no place for business of fixed residence then such presentment is to be made to him in person wherever he can be found. Where no time has benn mentioned for presentment has been specified, a bill must be presented within a reasonable time after it has been drawn.
HOLDERS DUTIES ON PRESENTMENT
The holder must, if so required by the drawee of the bill of exchange presented to him for acceptance, allow the drawee 48 hours to consider whether he will accept it or not. On the expiry of the period of 48 hrs the holder must demand back the bill whether accepted or not.
Another duty of the holder is to obtain only qualified and unconditional acceptance of the bill of exchange. If the drawee makes a qualified acceptance the holder should consider the bill as having been dishonoured.
The holders duties on presentment are:-
PRESENTMENT OF A PROMISSORY NOTE FOR SIGHT(SECTION-62)
Sometimes a promissory note may be made payable at the certain time after sight. Such a promissory note must be presented to the maker for sight thereof for sight by the person entitled to demand such payment within a reasonable time after it is made. In default of such presentment the party is liable to the person making such default.
PRESENTMENT FOR PAYMENT (SECTION 64)
All promissory notes, bills of exchange and cheques are presented for payment when the payment becomes due. The presumption is that the payment is to be made at the debtors place. The maker of the promissory note or the acceptor of the bill of exchange being principal debtor could be charged with liability even without presentment for payment.
PRESENTMENT BY WHOM
The presentment for the payment of the promissory note, bill of exchange etc is made to the maker, acceptor or the drawee of the instrument. Or if in case the acceptor is not alive then in such a case the legal representative would accept the bill of exchange.
TIME OF PRESENTMENT
A promissory note or bill of exchange made payable at specified period after date of sight thereof must be presented for payment at maturity. Every promissory note or bill of exchange which is not expressed to be payable on demand, at sight or on presentment is at maturity on the third day after the day on which it is expressed to be payable. A promissory note payable by installment must be presented for payment on the third day after the date fixed for payment of each installment.
When presentment for payment unnecessary.
NOTING AND PROTESTING
When a negotiable instrument is dishonored the holder may sue his prior parties i.e the drawer and the indorsers after he has given a notice of dishonor to them. The holder may need an authentic evidence of the fact that a negotiable instrument has been dishonored. When a cheque is dishonored general1y the bank who refuses payment returns back the cheque giving reasons in writing for the dishonor of the cheque. Sections 99 and l00 provide convenient methods of
authenticating the fact of dishonor of a bill of exchange and a promissory note by means of ‘noting’ and ‘protest’.
NOTING
As soon as a bill of exchange or a promissory note is dishonored, the holder can after giving the parties due notice of dishonor, sue the parties liable thereon. Section 99 provides a mode of authenticating the fact of the bill having been dishonored. Such mode is by noting the instrument. Noting is a minute recorded by a notary public on the dishonored instrument or on a paper attached to such instrument. When a bill is to be noted, the bill is taken to a notary public who represents it for acceptance or payment as the case may be and if the drawee or acceptor still refuses to accept or pay the bill, the bill is noted as stated above.
Noting should specify in the instrument, (a) the fact of dishonor, (b) the date of dishonor, (c) the reason for such dishonor, if any (d) the notary’s charges, (e) a reference to the notary’s register and (f) the notary’s initials.
Noting should be made by the notary within a reasonable time after dishonor. Noting and protesting is not compulsory but foreign bills must be protested for dishonor when such protest is required by the law of the place where they are drawn. Cheques do not require noting and protesting. Noting by itself has no legal effect. Still it has some advantages. If noting is done within a reasonable time protest may be drawn later on. Noting without protest is sufficient to allow a bill to be accepted for honor.
PROTEST
Protest is a formal certificate of the notary public attesting the dishonour of the bill by non-acceptance or by non-payment. After noting, the next step for notary is to draw a certificate of protest, which is a formal declaration on the bill or a copy thereof. The chief advantage of
protest is that the court on proof of the protest shall presume the fact of dishonour.
Besides the protest for non-acceptance and for non-payment the holder may protest the bill for better security. When the acceptor of a bill becomes insolvent or suspends payment before the date of maturity, or 47 when he absconds the holder may protest it in order to obtain better security for the amount due. For this purpose the holder may employ a notary public to make the demand on the acceptor and if refused, protest may be made. Notice of protest may be given to prior parties. When promissory notes and bills of exchange are required to be protested, notice of protest must be given instead of notice of dishonour. (Sec. 102)
Inland bills may or may not be protested. But foreign bills must be protested for dishonour when such protest is required by the law of the place where they are drawn (Sec. 104). Where a bill is required to be protested under the Act within a specified time, it is sufficient if it is ‘noted for protest’ within such time. The formal protest may be given at anytime after the noting (Sec. 104A)
Contents of protest
Section 101 of the Act lays down the contents of a regular and perfect protest which are as follows:
DISHONOUR OF CHEQUE (SECTION 138)
Dishonouring of a Cheque u/s 138 A cheque is a type of bill of exchange and is a negotiable instrument. It is used for making payments without any need to carry cash. A Dishonoured Cheque is a Cheque that is not credited by the Bank for numerous reasons including: The signature does not match; the account on which the cheque is drawn has insufficient funds, the date is invalid – i.e. the presentation of the cheque 6 months from the date on the cheque.
The dishonouring of a cheque u/s 138 is considered a criminal offence, if anyone draws a cheque on an account, maintained by him with a banker, to pay someone else money and the cheque bounces, that person is guilty of having committed an offence under the Section 138, if the following conditions are involved:
• The cheque should have been drawn to discharge a legally-enforceable debt or other liability, either wholly or partially.
• The cheque should have bounced because the amount of money standing to the credit of that account is insufficient to honour the cheque or because it exceeds the amount arranged to be paid from that account by an agreement made with that bank. However, if, for example, a cheque bounces because the signature on the cheque does not match one in the Bank’s records, Section 138 is not applicable.
• The cheque should have been presented within period of six months or within period of its validity, whichever is earlier.
• The payee or the holder in due course should have issued a notice in writing to the drawer within thirty days of the receipt of information by him from the bank regarding the return of cheque as unpaid.
• After the receipt of the said notice by the payee or the holder in due course, the drawer should have failed to pay the cheque amount with in fifteen days of the receipt of the said notice.
• On non-payment of the amount due on a dishonoured cheque within fifteen days of the receipt of notice by the drawer, the complaint should have been filed within one month from the date of expiry with the grace time of fifteen days, before a Metropolitan Magistrate or someone not below the rank of a Judicial Magistrate, First Class. The cognizance of a complaint may be taken by the court after the prescribed period, if the complaint satisfies the court that he had sufficient case for not making a complaint within the specified period.
• The Offence under this Act is compoundable (A compoundable offence is one which can be settled privately).
Copyright 2014 @ Dejuris Consultants
Dejurislawnotes@gmail.com
Pranam.pankaj@gmail.com